| 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
slam23 Junior Member
Posts : 60 Join date : 2009-01-20 Location : the Netherlands
| Subject: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:06 pm | |
| Hi Groni and JP, I have followed the recent VP9 development and I'm as excited as you are about the new stuff that's possible, especially with the physics. I'll gladly wait for new VP9 versions to come out. I have only one tiny wish, could you still support the creation of the "old" landscape versions of the new VP9 tables? I think a lot of people have monitors that can't be easily turned 90 degrees to play in portrait-style. I'm not adept at creating tables, so I don't know how many differences there are between making the same table for portrait and landscape, I hope it isn't too much work, so we can enjoy both if possible. Greetings Slam23 | |
|
| |
Groni Admin
Posts : 94 Join date : 2009-01-13 Age : 48 Location : Remscheid, Germany
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:23 am | |
| We have not planned till yet to do that 2 Monitor Tables. It has to be tested, how it works. I guess Twilight Zone and Fish Tales will be released as usual to keep the best compatipilty. Maybe there will be 2 Monitor Versions later.
GRONI | |
|
| |
slam23 Junior Member
Posts : 60 Join date : 2009-01-20 Location : the Netherlands
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:41 am | |
| Thanks! Looking forward to the new tables! Slam23 | |
|
| |
1234fd Junior Member
Posts : 22 Join date : 2009-01-14 Location : Bahia
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:51 pm | |
| - Groni wrote:
- We have not planned till yet to do that 2 Monitor Tables. It has to be tested, how it works. I guess Twilight Zone and Fish Tales will be released as usual to keep the best compatipilty. Maybe there will be 2 Monitor Versions later.
GRONI I think that only a small minority of people have the possibility to play with two monitors in portrait mode. The huge majority are playing with one monitor, 4:3 or eventually 16:9, in lanscape mode.In my case, playing mainly at work, no way I can use my wide screen vertically
Last edited by 1234fd on Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:52 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo) | |
|
| |
TuNk77 Junior Member
Posts : 84 Join date : 2009-01-16
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:15 pm | |
| I can only speak for myself, I have the possibility to play tables with two monitors, but I don't bother with it, too much fuss with it But tables with 16:10 (1920x1200) support would be nice | |
|
| |
slam23 Junior Member
Posts : 60 Join date : 2009-01-20 Location : the Netherlands
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:37 am | |
| Hey 1234fd, that's one hell of a nice job you must have! Does your boss read forums at all? | |
|
| |
1234fd Junior Member
Posts : 22 Join date : 2009-01-14 Location : Bahia
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:55 pm | |
| As long as he is making nice profits with my job, he doesn´t interfere, & he is often travelling.Have a look here: WWW.brazilgems.com.br
Last edited by 1234fd on Tue Feb 03, 2009 4:06 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
1234fd Junior Member
Posts : 22 Join date : 2009-01-14 Location : Bahia
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Tue Feb 03, 2009 4:03 pm | |
| Here you see better! Nice job indeed! | |
|
| |
slam23 Junior Member
Posts : 60 Join date : 2009-01-20 Location : the Netherlands
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:34 am | |
| Nice! So you are a gem cutter? That's real craftmanship. The closest I have come to gems of that caliber -besides in some cRPG's - was in Idar-Oberstein in Germany. Saw a gem cutter at work: I don't believe I would have the patience to work on the facets! Greetings SLam23 | |
|
| |
1234fd Junior Member
Posts : 22 Join date : 2009-01-14 Location : Bahia
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:30 pm | |
| - slam23 wrote:
- Nice! So you are a gem cutter? That's real craftmanship. The closest I have come to gems of that caliber -besides in some cRPG's - was in Idar-Oberstein in Germany. Saw a gem cutter at work: I don't believe I would have the patience to work on the facets!
Greetings SLam23 I´m a gemologist & my job is to comercialize gems & jewels, directly here at our offices or through internet. it could be worse! | |
|
| |
esoteric_rt Junior Member
Posts : 14 Join date : 2009-01-15 Age : 41 Location : Christchurch, New Zealand
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:51 am | |
| - slam23 wrote:
- Hi Groni and JP,
I have followed the recent VP9 development and I'm as excited as you are about the new stuff that's possible, especially with the physics. I'll gladly wait for new VP9 versions to come out. I have only one tiny wish, could you still support the creation of the "old" landscape versions of the new VP9 tables? I think a lot of people have monitors that can't be easily turned 90 degrees to play in portrait-style. I'm not adept at creating tables, so I don't know how many differences there are between making the same table for portrait and landscape, I hope it isn't too much work, so we can enjoy both if possible. Greetings Slam23 Have to say if there was a chance of getting new tables in portrait view it would be awesome, I would use them in my cabinet | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 | |
| |
|
| |
| 16:9 VP9 table support vs. the "old" 4:3 | |
|